The U. S. Supreme Court decided unanimously that health maintenance organizations cannot be sued for providing physicians with financial incentives to keep costs down. The case, Herdrich v. Pegram, involved a woman who complained of abdominal pain only to be told that she would have to wait eight days for an ultrasound. Her appendix subsequently ruptured, causing peritonitis. Upon recovery, she sued her HMO in state court, claiming that they had violated their fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
The U. S. Supreme Court decided unanimously that health maintenance organizations cannot be sued for providing physicians with financial incentives to keep costs down. The case, Herdrich v. Pegram, involved a woman who complained of abdominal pain only to be told that she would have to wait eight days for an ultrasound. Her appendix subsequently ruptured, causing peritonitis. Upon recovery, she sued her HMO in state court, claiming that they had violated their fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff failed to state an ERISA claim, but left HMOs vulnerable to lawsuits in the state courts.
Karen Igniani, president of the American Association of Health Plans, called the decision a "resounding victory for maintaining affordable care" and an "equally resounding defeat for suit-happy trial lawyers."
"The Court's decision today validates the principle that the legal system is not the place to make healthcare work," said Igniani. "Rather, we should all work together to make sure that patients have a way to quickly and fairly resolve disputes when they disagree with health plan coverage decisions. We will continue to advocate strongly for a patient's right to an outside, independent review."
Added Chip Kahn, president of the Health Insurance Association of America, "The Herdrich decision makes clear that a health plan's use of incentive payments and other devices to encourage affordable healthcare is not a violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. In so ruling, the high court dealt a body blow against one of the key tenets of several baseless class-action suits launched recently against many health plans. It is our hope that the trial bar will heed the message of Herdrich and recognize that consumers are ill-served by expensive litigation that would drive up coverage costs and dramatically increase the number of uninsured Americans." PR
The Transformative Role of Medical Information in Customer Engagement
October 3rd 2024Stacey Fung, Head of Global Medical Information at Gilead Lifesciences, delves into the evolving role of Medical Information (MI) in the pharmaceutical industry. Covering key topics like patient engagement through omnichannel strategies, combating misinformation, and leveraging AI to enhance medical inquiries, the conversation with Stacey highlights MI's critical role in ensuring patient safety and supporting drug development. She also shares her professional journey and tidbits for early career professionals on professional development.
Unlocking value and cost savings in patient services with technology and talent
October 2nd 2024Traci Miller, Director, Sonexus™ Access and Patient Support, Cardinal Health, discusses the current digital trends in the patient services industry and how the optimal balance of technology and talent can transform manufacturer-sponsored patient support programs. Hear how Cardinal Health combines best-in-class program and pharmacy operations with smart digital tools to ensure product and patient success and reduce operational costs.