
Forest Labs Hit with Bad Ad Tattle
Forest Labs has had a tough time with regulators over the last two years. The company’s sales reps can’t seem to stop breaking the law.
Forest Labs has had a tough time with regulators over the last two years. The company’s sales reps can’t seem to stop breaking the law.
The latest offense, which generated an
from the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP), was brought to light through OPDP’s
Last October, according to the Untitled Letter (dated August 1), Forest reps made statements to physicians that both minimized risks and broadened the indication for Daliresp, a COPD drug. Daliresp launched in August 2011, and earned $31.2 million in Forest’s 2012 fiscal year; the company is forecasting sales of $85 million for 2013. “OPDP is concerned that the violative conduct…occurred despite Forest’s September 15, 2010, Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA)…that requires Forest to ensure that its policies and procedures address ‘appropriate ways to conduct promotional…functions in compliance with all FDA requirements, and to provide specific training to its employees engaged in promotional functions,” OPDP admonished.
“False and misleading statements from Forest sales representatives are particularly troubling considering OPDP expressed concerns regarding similar violative promotional activities as recently as April 2011,” the letter stated, noting a separate Untitled Letter addressing the promotion of Savella, a fibromyalgia drug, for unapproved uses, as well as a minimization of “serious risks” associated with drug.
Untitled Letters are small potatoes compared with the
The OIG couldn’t be immediately reached for a status update on Solomon’s exclusion, or whether or not Forest will face additional penalties under its CIA for non-compliance. Check back for updates.
Newsletter
Lead with insight with the Pharmaceutical Executive newsletter, featuring strategic analysis, leadership trends, and market intelligence for biopharma decision-makers.





