Lack of trust in pharma-provided content proves to be a key barrier to successful engagement, highlighting issues like promotional spin, information availability, and more.
Digital transformation is changing the way pharmaceutical companies engage with HCPs, with many seeking to take advantage of technology to create engaging digital products. But, despite heavy investment, only 4% of executives say that their company’s digital product launches are regularly succeeding.1
While there could be any number of reasons for a digital product to fall short of expectations, engagement is a critical issue. It is important to understand and address the barriers that prevent HCPs from pharma companies’ digital channels, as well as the day-to-day experiences that shape their engagement.
Graphite Digital’s latest report Trust: The key factor in digital HCP engagement?2 investigates the pressure points and concerns that HCPs have when it comes to accessing and using digital pharma products. Throughout our interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs) and senior pharma leaders from Pfizer, Takeda and Astellas Pharma, the conversation often came back to trust—or a lack thereof—as a key barrier, with 80% of HCPs admitting that they do not trust pharma-provided content.
HCPs need pharma companies, and vice versa. However, the current lack of trust is affecting the effectiveness of the relationship between the two, impacting behavior and engagement on and offline.
To identify specific recommendations to address HCPs’ lack of trust in pharma-provided digital content, it is important to understand the limitations, pain points, and frustrations that stand in the way of the user experience of current digital platforms.
Our report highlights four core issues that impact HCPs willingness to use content from pharma companies:
It may feel like there is a mountain to climb when it comes to rebuilding trust in pharma content, but really, it comes down to one thing: customer-centricity.
Given the concerns, we know that to build trust and increase engagement, pharma companies must produce transparent and neutral content, presented on digital platforms that are easy to use. The medical profession is deeply based in science, and that means that they want to see the evidence of the claims being made for themselves—and that data needs to be readily available to avoid frustration.
Putting medical expertise front-and-center presents a significant opportunity to build trust too. While pharma companies’ relationships with HCPs vary by countries, HCPs find it reassuring to know that the medical team has been involved in the development of content as these teams are generally seen to be more aligned with HCP priorities and are thought to understand the needs of the physician.
Following these suggestions will provide a good starting point for building trust in digital pharma content, however adopting an empathy-based marketing approach requires ongoing insight. Having regular, in-depth conversations with HCPs, listening to their feedback on your content and digital innovations is vital if you are to pursue a truly customer-centric mindset.
We find that brands perceive user testing might take a long time, or will be very risky or expensive—but this is often not the case. And what you are likely to find is that by testing early, you vastly increase the chances of your solution finding favor with your target market.
By taking this approach—developing an evidence-based, customer-centric mindset—you will create greater value for your target market, leading to higher levels of engagement, greater trust and greater commercial outcomes.
Rob Verheul is the CEO of Graphite Digital
Key Findings of the NIAGARA and HIMALAYA Trials
November 8th 2024In this episode of the Pharmaceutical Executive podcast, Shubh Goel, head of immuno-oncology, gastrointestinal tumors, US oncology business unit, AstraZeneca, discusses the findings of the NIAGARA trial in bladder cancer and the significance of the five-year overall survival data from the HIMALAYA trial, particularly the long-term efficacy of the STRIDE regimen for unresectable liver cancer.
Cell and Gene Therapy Check-in 2024
January 18th 2024Fran Gregory, VP of Emerging Therapies, Cardinal Health discusses her career, how both CAR-T therapies and personalization have been gaining momentum and what kind of progress we expect to see from them, some of the biggest hurdles facing their section of the industry, the importance of patient advocacy and so much more.
ROI and Rare Disease: Retooling the ‘Gene’ Value Machine
November 14th 2024Framework proposes three strategies designed to address the unique challenges of personalized and genetic therapies for rare diseases—and increase the probability of economic success for a new wave of potential curative treatments for these conditions.