• Sustainability
  • DE&I
  • Pandemic
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Technology
  • Regulatory
  • Global
  • Pricing
  • Strategy
  • R&D/Clinical Trials
  • Opinion
  • Executive Roundtable
  • Sales & Marketing
  • Executive Profiles
  • Leadership
  • Market Access
  • Patient Engagement
  • Supply Chain
  • Industry Trends

Agency Best Practice in Regulatory Compliance


Pharmaceutical Executive

Pharmaceutical ExecutivePharmaceutical Executive-02-02-2006
Volume 0
Issue 0

The pharmaceutical industry imposes higher standards on advertising, PR, and medical education agencies than any other industry, except perhaps the financial services sector. Agencies need to keep up with constantly changing rules for advertising and promoting drugs or devices.

The pharmaceutical industry imposes higher standards on advertising, PR, and medical education agencies than any other industry, except perhaps the financial services sector. Agencies need to keep up with constantly changing rules for advertising and promoting drugs or devices.

Pharmaceutical companies are hyper-focused on compliance. They cannot afford the high costs of noncompliance, which can include criminal prosecution, corporate integrity agreements, negative media attention, loss of business, and damage to product reputation—not to mention high legal fees and penalties. In the past five years, pharma paid well over $3 billion in government fines. Yet even as regulatory compliance becomes a greater priority for pharmaceutical companies, communications agencies fail to understand the urgency of the issues.

"Agencies that represent drugs or devices must carefully protect their client's reputation, and that means preventing the likelihood of any regulatory violations," says Lynn O'Connor Vos, president and CEO, Grey Healthcare Group. Vos, named 2005 Woman of the Year by the Healthcare Businesswomen's Association (HBA), focused her acceptance speech on strategies to repair people's trust in the industry. "Compliance know-how is clearly an important step for agencies to take as they help restore the tarnished image of the pharmaceutical industry."

Regulation has always been crucial in pharma. When FDA started to permit product-specific TV ads directed at consumers in 1977, the advertising and PR worlds again had to adjust. Companies that did not take FDA enforcement seriously in the 1990s were quickly left behind. In 1991, a widely misconstrued FDA video news release (VNR) policy led to a cessation in their issuance for specific products. FDA's clamp down on continuing medical education (CME) programs meant lost business for CME suppliers.

Today, FDA is no longer the most important body overseeing pharmaceutical marketing. FDA's worst enforcement actions are only warning letters requiring corrective campaigns. It remains an integral player, though it does not wield the largest stick.

"In today's environment, where the stakes are higher, our clients now expect that we fully understand and closely follow the rules," states Laura Schoen, partner and president of the Weber Shandwick global healthcare practice.

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) are, arguably, more important overseers, since they can impose monstrous fines on companies for their promotional practices. Medicare Part D was implemented as of January 1, so the marketplace will not only become more competitive on a price basis, but the government will become by far the biggest source of revenue—further increasing scrutiny. In addition, most companies choose to comply with new guidelines from PhRMA, and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME).

Given the high visibility of violations and the potential costs, agencies that provide advertising, PR, medical education, or other services to the pharmaceutical industry must be aware of all these initiatives and understand the rulebook.

It is not sufficient for agencies to simply rely on their client's internal legal and regulatory clearances when honing their regulatory compliance skills. It's true that every company, without exception, has an internal review process for promotional materials, including technical, legal, and regulatory reviews. But some companies have more internal expertise than others, especially when it comes to staying abreast of regulatory changes. And clearly, many violations get past the internal systems—which is why there are so many investigations and FDA enforcement actions. Last year set an all-time high for warning letters.

There's another reason for agencies to keep up with the latest regulations: In this day and age, regulatory savvy may well be an agency's greatest competitive advantage. Agencies that understand the rules can present concepts that are both effective from a communications standpoint, and compliant, are positioned to earn the respect of current and prospective clients.

In short, advertising, PR, and medical education agencies need to keep their eyes on the moving regulatory target of drug promotion.

Establish Internal Agency Credo

Specifically, agencies should consider establishing an internal agency credo, similar to that which pharmaceutical companies have, to maintain a culture of compliance. This would include procedures for notifying clients when the agency feels a program or message is not in compliance.

The support and commitment of senior management is key, if regulatory compliance problems are to be prevented, or at least resolved. To that end, agencies must fund internal protocols to assure that there is an infrastructure for proper regulatory and legal review of all programs and materials sent to clients.

Invest in Compliance Education

Today the cost of doing business must include a line item for compliance training. For agencies, ongoing internal education for executive, senior, and mid-level staffers is critical to assuring that their regulatory knowledge is current. It's not enough to have only one or two individuals in-house who understand regulatory matters. All staff should be schooled on the basics, with management taking additional time to further expand its own level of knowledge.

"Internal education is the price of doing business in healthcare communications," says Susan Torroella, president and CEO of Columbia MedCom Group. "As one of the first medical education agencies to separate its accredited and non-accredited subsidiaries, we intimately understand that know-how in regulatory compliance must apply to both promotional and educational arms of the company."

Robin Winter-Sperry, MD, president, Scientific Advantage, concurs, "One of the best forms of risk reduction is education." She should know: Her company creates and trains medical-science liaisons (MSL) and medical-affairs teams, which play a key role in information exchange between companies and healthcare providers. "In essence, they can be models for compliance and professional ethics," says Winter-Sperry.

Consult Regulatory Counsel

Agencies should have access to regulatory insights from a team of experts with intimate knowledge of advertising, PR, advocacy, public affairs, and medical education. Program execution is becoming increasingly integrated, with various disciplines working together on large campaigns, so one-dimensional counsel may be inadequate. Compliance counsel is beneficial for both new business development and current client engagements.

Understand Compliance Systems

Reaching out to clients on a systematic basis will enable agencies to gain a better understanding of their own internal policies and procedures. Each client company will view the regulatory environment somewhat differently, so it is important for agencies to understand their clients' internal clearance process and how they must interact with them.

By the same token, marketers should insist that their agencies have processes to educate staff about the government regulations and policies, so that energy and time need never be wasted on themes, programs, or language that will not be used. Not far off in the future: a new standard of agency selection where agency-of-record status will be predicated on a mandatory level of regulatory training and certification.

Certainly an industry-wide policy that sets compliance as a goal for communications agencies—similar to the policy PhRMA has established for the pharmaceutical companies themselves—will fuel increased investment in compliance education.

For clients, keeping agencies informed of corporate regulatory policies is time-consuming. Pharmaceutical companies would benefit from programs for educating agencies about the company's position on compliance. Turn-key electronic training solutions can simplify the process so that frequency of interaction remains high, and costs low.

Clients must also set realistic expectations for their promotional materials, and not ask their agencies to do something that could later be construed as violative. Companies and agencies must discuss their attitudes toward government compliance during the materials-development process.

This is clearly not a time for agencies to be watching the evolution of public policy from the sidelines. Instead, they should be actively engaged in getting their own houses in order. Recognizing the challenges faced by their clients, they must work to stay ahead of the curve. Nor is this a time when pharmaceutical marketers should be testing the limits of government authority or patience. Instead, they should be well grounded in the realities of the enforcement environment. They must act accordingly and expect those around them to do the same.

Wayne L. Pines (wpines@apcoworldwide.com) is president of regulatory services and healthcare at APCO Worldwide. Ilyssa Levins (ilevins@nyc.rr.com) is president of HCIL Consulting.

Related Videos
Related Content