
Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2015
The Cleveland Clinic once again ended its Medical Innovation Summit with a list of 10 advances voted most likely to have a major impact on improving patient care in 2015.
The Cleveland Clinic once again ended its Medical Innovation Summit with a list of
The 110 voting Cleveland Clinic physicians and scientists share their excitement with Pharm Exec, as evidenced in
Other top ten highlights:
Mobile Stroke Unit - Top Ten Ranking: #1
Why it’s needed:
Stroke is the 4th leading cause of death in the US with nearly 800,000 people suffering one each year. For stroke treatment, every second counts and the ambulance ride could be too long.
How it works:
Linking paramedics to neurologists via broadband video will save valuable time enabling stroke detection and administration of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) to patients while en route to the ER.
Dengue Fever Vaccine - Top Ten Ranking: #2
Why it’s needed:
50 to 100 million people contact dengue virus each year in tropical regions, with both undeveloped and develop nations affected. The virus is the fastest growing of all mosquito-borne tropical diseases. A vaccine must target serotypes 1, 2, 3 and 4, which vary in prevalence around the world.
How it works:
Sanofi’s live attenuated tetravalent vaccine is a yellow fever/dengue chimeric vaccine based on a yellow fever vaccine strain genomic backbone with substitutions of two genes encoding dengue proteins (according to
Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker - Top Ten Ranking: #7
Why it’s needed:
Since 1958, pacemakers have relied on leads, or thin wires, that are inserted through a vein and stretch to the heart to detect the patient’s heart rhythm. Leads can become problematic, breaking, cracking, or they can be sites of infection.
How it works:
The next advance in pacemaker technology may be a vitamin-sized, self-contained, wireless cardiac pacemaker, which is implanted directly in the heart without surgery. The device’s lithium battery life is estimated at 7 years.
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Breast Cancer - Top Ten Ranking: #9
Why it’s needed:
Following lumpectomy, despite the chances of recurrence, women often fail to receive enough follow-up external beam radiation therapy due to excessive burdens like cost or the need to travel long distances to their radiation facilities. Radiation therapy often requires five visits a week for three to six weeks.
How it works:
The high dose of radiation is administered following excision – during the surgical procedure – via an applicator. At approximately one-fifth the cost of traditional radiation treatments, the method delivers a single high dose directly to the former site of the tumor around the lumpectomy cavity, and the applicator is removed after 30 minutes. Recurrence levels from clinical trials in patients with early stage breast cancer have shown IORT to be as effective as whole breast radiation with reduced rates of skin toxicity.
Newsletter
Lead with insight with the Pharmaceutical Executive newsletter, featuring strategic analysis, leadership trends, and market intelligence for biopharma decision-makers.