Trial design implications
- Future CAR-T approvals expected to rely on randomized trials with SOC control groups.
- Superiority over existing CAR-Ts is now the general evidentiary bar.
- Equivalence or noninferiority allowed only with strong FDA-supported justification.
- Single-arm trials may face challenges under the new framework.
FDA Biologics Chief Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, has outlined new plans for how the agency will be approving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies in oncology.
In a new commentary published in JAMA, Prasad, along with other top FDA officials, described how the agency will be requiring potential CAR-T therapies to demonstrate superiority over existing CAR-Ts through a control group in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).
“As the field of cell therapy matures, the FDA’s perspective continues to evolve to (1) maintain the high evidentiary standards for approval, and (2) exercise regulatory flexibilities, when necessary, to advance the development of these products,” the authors wrote.1
New trial design calls for standard of care control group
There are currently seven CAR-Ts approved, all of which were brought to market on the heels of data from single-arm trials without a control group.
The FDA officials emphasized the choice of control group, calling for sponsors to evaluate both standard of care and ethical components when deciding on treatments. The new goal for sponsors in RCTs evaluating CAR-Ts should be to ensure that outcomes from an investigational therapy are reliably distinguished from factors such as natural disease history and other treatments.
“Evidence should generally demonstrate superiority of the investigational CAR T-cell therapy compared with control,” Prasad and his colleagues wrote in the article. "Any plan to establish effectiveness of a new CAR T-cell product compared with an approved CAR T-cell therapy based on demonstration of equivalence or noninferiority must be adequately justified and discussed with the FDA.”
Industry impact
In June, Gilead and Arcellx unveiled results from a pivotal, single-arm trial evaluating their anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy for multiple myeloma. Data showed that it had potentially better safety than Legend Biotech and Johnson & Johnson’s CAR-T Carvykti.2 While Gilead and Arcellx plan to seek approval, it is unclear how this new FDA perspective will impact the potential therapy.