A federal judge disagrees with HHS Secretary Kennedy and the CDC on vaccines.
Specifically, Boston US District Court Judge Brian Murphy ruled that Kennedy improperly replaced the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee last year, NPR reports.1 As a result, Murphy placed a hold on decisions made by the current committee.
Why did the judge rule against RFK Jr’s actions?
Emerging Pharma Leaders nominations are now open!
Do you know someone who can make tough decisions that continue to face manufacturers? Are they destined to change the future of pharma?
Nominate a colleague with impressive leadership and career intentions – even yourself! – for the Pharmaceutical Executive 2026 Emerging Pharma Leaders Awards.
In a statement issued by one of the plaintiffs in the case,2 the IDSA, confirmed that the ruling agreed that the secretary’s actions violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The hold impacts that revised vaccine schedule issued by HHS earlier this year, along with decisions made regarding the COVID 19 vaccine and Hepatitis B vaccines.
The other plaintiffs in the suit include:
- The American Academy of Pediatrics
- American Public Health Association
- American College of Physicians
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- The Massachusetts Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics
- Massachusetts Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics
The plaintiffs also includes three individuals listed as Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and Jane Doe 3.
In the IDSA’s statement, attorney for the plaintiffs Richard Hughes IV of Epstein Becker Green said, “This ruling is a momentous step toward restoring science-based vaccine policymaking. The judge recognized that the actions of Secretary Kennedy and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices are not grounded in science and that they are destructive. We are thrilled that the court has discarded the baseless vaccine schedule changes made by Secretary Kennedy and is blocking the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices from doing further damage to vaccine policy."