OR WAIT null SECS
© 2023 MJH Life Sciences™ and Pharmaceutical Executive. All rights reserved.
The key issues for industry and FDA as the Orphan Drug Act hits its 40th anniversary.
As patients and the public health community mark the 40th anniversary of the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, biopharma companies and FDA officials are acknowledging continued challenges in testing, approving, and producing new treatments for critical conditions affecting small patient populations. The program has led to market approval of more than 600 therapies to treat serious diseases affecting less than 200,000 patients in the US, investment spurred by grants and tax credits to help fund very small clinical trials, exemptions from hefty user fees, plus seven years added of marketing exclusivity for approved orphans and more incentives for developing rare disease treatments for children.1
FDA notes that orphan therapies accounted for more than half of novel new drugs approved in 2022, and that the agency already has approved two notable rare disease treatments this year. At the same time, clinical development and approval of orphan drugs is often difficult, as trial results may be unclear, and the high cost of research and manufacturing can limit industry investment. Tension continues between funding the development of these much-needed therapies and ensuring their affordability for government health programs as well as individuals, particularly with the development of more gene therapies to treat “ultra-rare” diseases and “bespoke” conditions.
Although FDA marked Rare Disease Day in February by approving an important new rare disease drug, the lengthy path to market for Reata Pharmaceuticals’ Skyclarys (omaveloxolone) to treat the neurological disorder Friedreich’s ataxia illustrates both the promises and the challenges in this field. The drug gained approval only after years of development because its initial pivotal clinical trial did not convince FDA of its effectiveness in slowing disease progression. Approval finally came when the agency determined that Reata’s three-year open-label extension, or natural history, study of patients demonstrated notable gains for individuals taking the drug vs. placebo.2 Reata has set the list price for Skyclarys at $370,000 a year, which will be watched closely for its impact on coverage, costs and patient pushback.
Meanwhile, FDA is moving on several fronts to provide additional assistance to sponsors in designing studies and obtaining needed data to bring rare disease therapies to patients. An initiative from the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) aims to provide increased interactions with agency experts for firms developing promising rare disease gene therapies, an approach that proved highly effective in accelerating the development of critical vaccines during the pandemic. This “Communications Pilot” will aim to answer questions quickly in order to speed the development and approval of orphan breakthrough therapies or regenerative medicine advanced therapies (RMATs).
Similarly, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) reports advances in its Accelerating Rare disease Cures (ARC) program—sort of an “Operation Warp Speed” for orphan drugs that coordinates CDER offices in collaborating with industry and patient groups to facilitate product development.3 CDER notes that ARC has formed several consortia to advance treatments for specific rare disorders, and the initiative may support development of new biomarkers and outcomes measures for clinical trials, as well as natural history studies to serve as external controls for developing treatments for less well-known conditions where historical controls may be inadequate.
Both CDER and CBER are involved in the Rare Disease Endpoint Advancement (RDEA) Pilot Program, another initiative offering sponsors more assistance in developing efficacy endpoints for orphan therapies.4 Supported by recently reauthorized user fees for drugs and biologics, the RDEA pilot will support a handful of sponsors that have initiated rare disease development programs involving novel efficacy endpoints or natural history studies utilizing a proposed endpoint.
And recent legislation has established an initiative to accelerate the development of more effective treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) through an FDA Rare Neurodegenerative Disease grants program].5 The awards aim to cover R&D costs of new therapies for ALS and a range of rare neurogenerative diseases in adults and children, as spelled out in an FDA action plan issued in June 2022.
Efforts to advance rare disease treatments, however, may be stymied by the ongoing legal battle that has raised challenges to FDA policies governing the scope of orphan drug exclusivity policy. FDA has opposed a recent federal court decision, Catalyst v. Becerra, that granted an orphan drug producer broader exclusivity for treating all aspects of its target condition, and not just the specific uses or indications cited in its application. FDA approved a Catalyst drug for use in adults, but the company sued the agency later for approving another drug for pediatric treatment for the same condition. A federal Court of Appeals supported Catalyst and rejected FDA’s claim that it has authority to make its more limited approval decision.
Despite that court ruling, FDA has insisted that it will continue to tie orphan drug exclusivity only to approved uses or indications.6 The agency has pressed Congress to enact legislation to clarify this stance, but so far has failed to gain action on Capitol Hill. One result is that some manufacturers are delaying investment in orphan drug development, waiting for further clarification on expected exclusivity terms from FDA or the courts.
Jill Wechsler is Pharm Exec's Washington Correspondent and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.