• Sustainability
  • DE&I
  • Pandemic
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Technology
  • Regulatory
  • Global
  • Pricing
  • Strategy
  • R&D/Clinical Trials
  • Opinion
  • Executive Roundtable
  • Sales & Marketing
  • Executive Profiles
  • Leadership
  • Market Access
  • Patient Engagement
  • Supply Chain
  • Industry Trends

Protecting People Everywhere

Article

Pharmaceutical Executive

Pharmaceutical ExecutivePharmaceutical Executive-12-01-2001
Volume 0
Issue 0

Washington, DC-More countries are hosting pharma's R&D efforts, creating a research environment ripe for abuses of patient safety because FDA cannot ensure the same protection in foreign trials as in domestic ones. A recent study by the US Health and Human Service's office of the inspector general (OIG) found that regions with less research experience-including Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia-have become more desirable locations for US-based companies and contract research organizations' clinical trials. In fact, the number of countries producing data for FDA submissions jumped from 28 to 79 between 1989 and 1999. And that trend shows no

Washington, DC-More countries are hosting pharma's R&D efforts, creating a research environment ripe for abuses of patient safety because FDA cannot ensure the same protection in foreign trials as in domestic ones. A recent study by the US Health and Human Service's office of the inspector general (OIG) found that regions with less research experience-including Eastern Europe, Latin America, and East Asia-have become more desirable locations for US-based companies and contract research organizations' clinical trials. In fact, the number of countries producing data for FDA submissions jumped from 28 to 79 between 1989 and 1999. And that trend shows no signs of slowing.

Currently, foreign institutional review boards (IRBs) oversee the ethical treatment of patients, but they have been widely criticized by the pharma industry, national regulatory authorities, the National Bioethics Commission, and the World Health Organization for their lack of experience and insufficient monitoring practices.

IRBs are known as ethical committees-there to protect the populations' safety-says Basil Burke, PhD, vice-president of drug discovery and development for Clinimetrics, a global CRO. Whether they are doing that is a pivotal question that FDA must face. Right now, it is up to CEOs to recognize and stop shortcuts on patients' rights.

The issue has heated up since the Washington Post ran a series of articles in late 2000, questioning Pfizer's treatment of Nigerian children participating in its 1996 clinical trials for the meningitis treatment Trovan (trova-floxacin) and inspiring OIG to conduct the study.

Yet companies will probably continue to seek emerging regions for clinical trials because it makes business sense: Large numbers of eager participants and naïve subjects-patients untreated for the disease being studied-save companies money by speeding trial recruitment, and testing in another country allows extended market development. Enabling the trend is FDA's acceptance of international data in line with the standardized procedures laid down at the 1990 International Conference on Harmonization.

In the report cover letter, inspector general Janet Rehnquist issues her recommendations for FDA and the Office for Human Research Protections to help ensure foreign protections are at least equivalent to US regulations. They include:

  • develop an international accreditation system for institutional review boards

  • obtain more information about individual practices of foreign IRBs

  • help IRBs build more competency

  • encourage better research monitoring and greater researcher commitments to ethical standards.

Related Videos