Guest Blogger

Articles by Guest Blogger

Cuts in healthcare costs due to post-recession austerity programs mean favorable Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) are becoming crucial to the successful market launch of pharmaceuticals in Europe.

It is nowadays fashionable to question everyone in authority, and there is no shortage of self-appointed watchdogs who aim to make sure that things that happen are happening as they should.

The headlines have moved on for the English Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF). Replacing the positive press releases such as “thousands of patients to benefit” in 2013 are headlines shouting out that “thousands face being denied life-extending medication”.

By using digital signatures to eliminate paper from signature approval processes, pharmaceutical companies are achieving automated processes that are efficient and cost-effective without compromising security or compliance.

Eli Lilly forecasts that its profit will fall by up to one-third this year, Reuters has reported. The drugmaker’s forecasted revenue for 2014 is now between $19.2 billion and $19.8 billion, with a net income of $3 billion and operating cash flow of $4 billion.

So, we’ve experienced two months of Obamacare. How is the U.S. pharmaceutical industry doing with this new program? I spent two weeks getting the opinions of several Rx representatives on their experience with Obamacare, as well as their thoughts on how it is impacting their marketing, sales, and R&D planning for 2014 and beyond.

High prices, murky financial relations, and a reluctance to disclose clinical data are undermining public trust in industry and the research enterprise, writes Jill Wechsler.

At the end of this month, the European Medicines Agency will close the consultation on its draft policy on Publication and access to clinical-trial data. The aim of the policy is laudable: to open up as much information as possible into the public domain with the aim of stimulating new avenues of research.