Pricing

A look at two surveys that reveal payer perspectives regarding current and future management of high-cost durable therapies with one-time administration.

This article discusses how cost differences with other countries reflect income differences, how these differences are typical for cost in medical services, and more.

With employers and the public scrutinizing drug prices like never before, rebates-long at the center of pharma’s market access strategy-may be losing their luster, writes Amber Gilbert.

A look at the communication disconnect between contracting with managed care plans and pharmaceutical benefit managers (PBMs) and the imposition and implications of prior authorization (PA) requirements.

In response to growing Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) activity, Jenny Lee and Eric Latch take a revised look at payer reliance on ICER assessments and perceptions on value-based pricing.

A formal effort is underway in Europe to gather concrete clues on the value of real-world evidence in payer decision-making.

An Exploration of the Future of Pharmaceutical Value Assessments in the U.S.

Realizing the full potential of enabling technologies such as AI and machine learning in measuring treatment value and outcomes.

Industry working group identifies the value characteristics that may, collectively, become part of a higher-level, shared approach to valuing pharmaceutical treatments.

Rick Kelly and Nisha Desai review the proposals in the Pharmaceutical Drug Pricing Reduction Act (PDPRA) with the greatest potential impact.

The impacts of disruptive curative therapies and advances in the future of health will be profound. To be best positioned for success, healthcare systems under continuous cost pressure must address three key areas, writes Thomas Unger.

Leela Barham talks to Sir David Haslam, the outgoing Chair of UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), about the highs and lows of his six-year tenure at the organization.

The decision to eradicate pharma rebates and prompt direct discounts for federal beneficiaries could, if passed, upend the market-what are the critical questions for new products?

While there are challenges at every turn, the promise of outcomes-based contracting is a level of care for patients that might otherwise not be possible, while striking the right balance of benefits and risks for all parties involved, writes Melonie Warfel.

Its use, new data shows, could boost the economic benefit profile of more “common” drugs-and better inform HTA and payer decision-making.

In the second in a series of articles summarizing efforts to put each of the “American Patients First” blueprint's four strategies into action, Rick Kelly and Nisha Desai focus on “Better Negotiation”.

Cell and gene therapies in crosshairs of pricing focus, prompting stepped-up proposals on ways to finance these products.

A rule to eradicate drug rebates and prompt direct discounts for federal beneficiaries raises challenging questions for drug manufacturers and other stakeholders.

Ed Schoonveld reviews the key topics discussed at the World Health Organization's second Fair Pricing Forum, held in Johannesburg, South Africa last month.

The UK has had in place what amount to two pricing schemes for branded medicines for years. But with major changes to both schemes set out in 2018, it’s now a new tale of two pricing schemes. Leela Barham reports.

The benefits and challenges of outcomes-based contracting.

Among the new acronyms watch is UPI, or unjustified price increase, recently coined by ICER as part of its new workstream to explore price increases for both branded and generic drugs in the US.

How real-world evidence creates shared value for stakeholders across the healthcare spectrum.

An understanding of copay accumulator and maximizer benefit design programs.

While the increasing importance of real-world evidence (RWE) is widely acknowledged, the dramatic shift required by pharma to embed meaningful and holistic benefits from this capability is still a work in progress.